KARL  JASPERS  FORUM
TA111 (Beamish)

Response 9 (to Kanda)

SCALARS
by Peter Beamish
16 December 2008, posted 20 December 2008


Dr. Akira Kanda [time] wrote: - - [Comments in "[xx]," + 5 line ending.]
Hello ['peter'], - - - - - - - - - - [Reply is 54 lines or 1 page side.]
I still have difficulty in the energy, momentum, force etc. mentioned in
your quote. [Our quotation was that "REAL TIME" is a scalar label trans-
ported TO a mind, BY "A Mass &/or An Energy Vector," creating an "MVP."]

These concepts are defined in terms of time and mass and not vice versa
as the dimensional analysis shows. [No!! Velocity is defined in terms of
a displacement divided by "a duration," and, NOT divided by "REAL TIME!"
And, "a duration" is a difference between two, "temporal scalar labels."
And, "momentum" is defined in terms of mass together with its velocity.]

[AND, "REAL TIME IS NOW TIME (Essos)" AS DETERMINED BY A RECEIVING MIND.
AND, ALL OTHER "TEMPORAL CONCEPTS" ARE MERELY "TEMPORAL SCALAR LABELS."]

Dimensional analysis shows the hierarchy of concepts involved in theo-
retical physics. [There may be a duration hierarchy, but this is not re-
lated to "REAL TIME" or "NOW TIME," which is fundamental to biophysics.]

I trust that this is where modern physics failed as it violated this
hierarchy. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [Interesting!!]

- but time and space are definitely most fundamental. - - - - - [Agree!]

After all mathematics & physics are different things. [And the 20th cen-
tury physics of time differs from: "A 21ST CENTURY BIOPHYSICS OF TIME."]

From physics point of view, Minkowski's theory is a meaningless general
abstract nonsense. [Space = vector, time = scalar, use "time-in-space".]

Relativity theory, Quantum Physics, the standard model, string theory -.
None of them are of mathematical significance either. [With "ALL TIME IS
NOW TIME," we may need to modify the temporal aspects of such theories!]

From: [time] "Peace and science" to Dr. Atso, posted Dec. 15th, 18:35 h.

For me, a "reactionary" space has a most fundamental place and then time
has a basic place which is not symmetric to space. - [Scalar time labels
exist everywhere "in space" where there exist clocks, & said recordings.
Recall that there are "zillions" of clocks, in "our world!" And beyond?]

- I have no theory of time & space. [Try "RBC Theory" *** which has been
found to be what "The Great Whales" use, for low stress communications.]

- I am not an expert of time, but it seems to me that this concept is
still very debatable even within theoretical physics. [Both conventional
time t, as well as "Rhythm Based Time T," when real, are not readings ON
a clock, but instead are: "Scalar Label Mental Readings OF Said Clock."]

Sincerely, 'peter' c. beamish, ph.d., director, "CETA-Research," Canada.
For details of "MVPs" see < http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13163 >.
*** Major "RBC" Concepts at: <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/14607>
"A New Definition of Mind:" <http://www.egroups.com/message/time/13743>.
2 page glossary is @ http://www.animalcontact.com/research/glossary.html

---------------------------------------------

Peter Beamish
     e-mail <
beamish (at) oceancontact.com >